home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: giskard.demon.co.uk!dale
- From: dale@giskard.demon.co.uk (Dale Shuttleworth)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: Why 33600?
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 20:18:57 GMT
- Organization: Dale's home Linux box.
- Message-ID: <Dq0wFM.v2@giskard.demon.co.uk>
- References: <4kn9v9$n6e@solaris.cc.vt.edu> <4kok44$mj9@hg.oro.net> <3171de07.5184018@news.pbinet.com> <4l18iv$ps0@hg.oro.net>
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: giskard.demon.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]
-
- Hi,
-
- Ed Starry (estarry@oro.net) wrote:
-
- [ Something written either by someone with virtually no knowledge of
- serial communications or a carefully crafted troll. I've a bit of
- free time to take it apart either way.... ]
-
- : JNavas@NavasGrp.com (John Navas) wrote about {Re: Why 33600?} in
- : 'comp.dcom.modems'...
- :
- : ~> Not really! If people would start demanding (and using) 'cached serial
- : ~>ports' they would discover even 14.4's are much faster than they realize.To
- : ~>me this increasing of the Analog Rate is a marketing ploy.
- : --------------------------------------------------------------------
- :
- : ~No offense, but that's nonsense.
- : ===============================
- :
- : OK, explain how to achieve 230,400 bps from an 'Enhanced V.42bis' 28.8
- : modem? If I can transfer data at 7,000+ cps from a rickety 3 year old 14.4
- : 'WHY' do I need a modem with a higher Analog Rate?
-
- Because most of the time you do not get 7000+ cps, you get around 1650 cps
- plus the benefit of compression. Compression amounts to around 2.5:1 on
- English text so you get 4000 cps *on text files*. Compression is about
- 1:1 (i.e. inefective) on ZIP files so you get 1650 cps.
-
- With a 28.8kbps modem you can potentially get 8000cps on text files and
- 3300cps on ZIP files.
-
- : This is faster than many
- : people realize from a brand new 28.8 as it is. Yes, I could lower my DTE
- : setting to 57,600, or lower, to comply with your ill-advised recommendation
- : but I choose not to, there's no 'valid' reason.
-
- I agree that there is little benefit in lowering your serial port speed
- (unless you are experiencing overruns), but neither is there much of a
- performance hit. Your modem probably exceeds 5760cps for much less than
- 1% of your online time.
-
- : If compression is working as
- : designed then higher Analog Rates aren't needed, are they?
-
- So what you are saying is that I could create a ZIP file, and then
- compress it again by a reasonable factor? This is not possible.
- There is a limit to the extent to which file can be compressed. ZIP
- gets pretty close to this limit, modem compression will *not* compress
- it further.
-
- If you were right, you could compress a file, then compress it again,
- and again, and again. Eventually you would have a single bit of data -
- wow, really impressive data transfer rates; 1MB transmitted in less than
- 1/10th of a second. In fact the only problem comes when you try to
- uncompress it.....
-
- If you're transmitting ZIP files, your 14.4kbps modem is transmitting at
- around 1650cps, my 28.8kbps modem transmits the same file at 3300cps.
-
- : When 'YOU' tell
- : people how to attain throughput rates 'Exceeding 115,200 bps' then and only
- : then will I entertain the notion of upgrading to an 'Enhanced V.42bis' 28.8
- : modem! Until then I stand by my statement regarding 'marketing ploy'.
-
- It is possible to attain rates exceeding 115200 bps by (for example)
- using Hayes modems and ESP ports at either end of the link. Of course,
- this speed relies on compression; you'll still only manage 3300cps on
- ZIP files.
-
- : The reason I call the two 1,024 byte 'smart buffers' (your words) cache is
- : to differentiate between these I/O Buffers and the actual multi-byte serial
- : port (16550). When using the word 'buffer' many people, for reasons unknown
- : to me, instantly think of the 16550 UART and we both know this UART isn't a
- : buffer, don't we?
-
- Do we? The 16550 provides a 16 byte buffer. Even 16450s provide a buffer
- (its only 1 byte long though :-( ).
-
- : Simply semantics for the lay person, you have a better
- : definition to avoid confusion and 'convey meaning'? NOT 'smart buffer'!
-
- If you start talking about caching serial ports, two things happen.
- Firstly, lay persons get confused. Secondly, people who know what
- they're talking about will think that you're very confused.
-
- : The public now wants to know how to attain 230,400 bps data throughput from
- : a 28.8 modem, after all they exist. Don't say it's impossible or you might
- : alienate a number of modem manufactures, including USR. There is a way!
- : Convey to the vast unwashed masses how it's done all exalted modem maven!
- : There are thousands of modem users waiting with anticipation for your words
- : of wisdom and guidance in attaining the exhilarating rapture of experiencing
- : data transfer rates of 20+ KByte/sec using a 28.8 modem. Describe, 'in lay
- : terms', the necessary hardware and software required and how to configure
- : it. Use Windows V3.1 as the platform of choice as many people 'World Wide'
- : use this as their OS. Then post it in this News Group so people without Web
- : (http://) access can benefit from your infinite knowledge of modems.
-
- [ I don't know what you're on, but I think you ought to reduce the
- dose a little.... ]
-
- : If you perceive this as a challenge, it is.
-
- Really? It takes me less than 60 seconds to type "buy two Hayes V34
- Optimas and ESP serial ports and install them as described in the
- instructions".
-
- Of course, this setup is no better (probably worse in fact) than my
- V34 Courier and 16550A, but it will do what you ask on highly
- compressible data.
-
- Alternatively, I could say ZIP the data first and use 2400bps modems.
-
- : If you want to know the definition of 'Enhanced V.42bis' check out
- : <http://web.aimnet.com/~jnavas/modem/faq.html>.
-
- Whatever that piece of text says (I'm not writing this online so I
- can't check), "Enhanced V42bis" is something dreamt up by marketing
- folk. What this term is usually meant to convey is that the modem
- supports a larger V42bis dictionary size than normal and (when
- connected to another modem capable of using a larger dictionary size)
- the modem may achieve a better compression ratio than other modems.
-
- This benefit is of dubious value for two reasons, 1) you have to
- connect to a modem which supports the "better" compression and 2) the
- improvement is not very large (3:1 rather than 2.5:1 on English text?).
-
- : PS: While you're at it, would you tell everyone what a 'Serial Port
- : Interface capable of 128 Kbps' is? The 'External' BitSURFER Pro requires one
- : to achieve maximum performance and I want maximum performance. A few well
- : known brand and model names as an example will suffice!
-
- Just go round asking for V35 serial cards. I suspect that the BitSURFER
- Pro is an ISDN device and requires a synchronous interface?
-
- If you are tolling you are doing a good job. If you seriously believe
- the stuff you are writing *please* take the time to read peoples'
- responses - up can't get more confused than you currently appear to be.
-
- Dale.
- --
- ******************************************************************************
- * Dale Shuttleworth *
- * Email: dale@giskard.demon.co.uk *
- ******************************************************************************
-